The Chauvin Trial Isn’t The Slam Drunk it Should Be, says Ex-WH Spokesman Bob Weiner and Analyst Adjanni Ramos


Robert Weiner

Adjanni Ramos

WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, April 16, 2021 / — In a brand new op-ed published on The PuLSE Institute and featured in OpEdNews (links at bottom), former White House spokesman Robert Weiner and Policy Analyst Adjanni Ramos discuss how the current trial of former officer Derek Chaivin, for the murder of George Floyd, should “be a slam dunk…but is not, if just one juror maintains an unstated racial or police-can-do-no-wrong bias.”

They start by saying, “The trial of Chauvin for murdering Floyd is only half over after 35 witnesses including medical examiners, doctors, and even the Minneapolis Police Chief confirming it wasn’t the bystanders yelling ‘Don’t kill him, let him breathe.’ It wasn’t the observing firefighter asking to ‘test his pulse’ and ‘give him CPR’ who was ignored. It wasn’t any drugs or underlying heart issues. It wasn’t crowd noise. And it wasn’t any police training in force that was the ‘direct cause’ killing George Floyd—it was policeman Derek Chauvin’s knee on Floyd’s neck for than nine minutes and twenty-nine seconds, including three after he stopped breathing.”

They continue to say, “Still, one racially-biased of the twelve voting jurors, or one not admitting it earlier but believing the police can do no wrong, could block a unanimous-required guilty verdict for Murder 2, Murder 3, or even Manslaughter. The blue wall of silence by fellow police officers has been broken. Chauvin’s supervisors, his police teachers, and colleagues say he exceeded any needed force and broke ‘protocols.’ Yet the case could go awry if the psychological tricks of the defense give one juror an excuse to claim doubt.

They then write, “Detroit’s Congressman, the late John Conyers, for decades made ‘police brutality an issue… He brought Democrats and Republicans together to investigate and call for reforms—no chokeholds, no immunity from prosecution as the current House-passed ‘George Floyd’ bill would do. Now is the time for that, but it is also time for the law as it already exists to be enforced. There would be even less debate if the Floyd bill became law, but murder is already illegal regardless.”

They then write “The Floyd case looks the most promising of any in recent history. It will send a message heard around the world, almost as loudly as the viral videotape of the more than nine minutes of unresisted torture and murder. Or it could send the message that our criminal justice system is so broken that even the jury requirement of unanimity must be fixed and amended.”

They say, “We’ve gone through the two weeks of the prosecution case and defense cross-examination. Now we will be having the defense case and their shenanigans to lull the jury into complacency and ignoring the prosecution’s case. We will see tapes, witnesses, and ad nauseam questions on everything other than who and what killed Floyd. Let’s hope the jury members don’t have short memories.”

They contend, “It is shocking that another killing of an African American happened this week in Brooklyn Center, MN, just ten miles from the Chauvin trial – with a 26-year police officer claiming that she mistook her gun for a laser.

They state, “In 2020, there were 1021 fatal police shootings in the United States, including 241 African Americans—meaning that for the Black 13.4% of the American population, they were 23.6% of the killings—almost double. Since African Americans have the greatest poverty, police are killing not only disproportionately a minority but the poorest in the country – matching the discrimination in all areas of the criminal justice system.”


Link to OpEdNews version:

Robert Weiner and Ben Lasky
Weiner Public News
+1 2023061200
email us here